The American Federation of Teachers is mobilizing members against a retailer over immigration politics—another reminder that the modern teachers union is a political machine with classrooms attached.
Parents approaching a new school year might expect a national teachers union to be consumed with reading scores, classroom discipline, chronic absenteeism or the cost of school supplies. The American Federation of Teachers has found another priority: urging its 1.8 million members and their families to avoid Target.
The union calls its effort “Shop Smart, Support Working Families.” According to the AFT’s own announcement, the campaign responds to Target’s refusal to condemn Immigration and Customs Enforcement activity. It directs families toward alternative retailers and follows months of pressure on Target’s leadership.
The AFT is free to take political positions. Its members are citizens, and organized labor has every right to participate in public debate. But the campaign destroys the fiction that large teachers unions are merely professional associations focused narrowly on better schools.
This is political leverage, organized through the machinery and reach of a union whose public identity rests on education. Target has not been accused of cheating teachers, mistreating students or raising the price of notebooks. It is being punished for declining to endorse the union’s position in a national immigration dispute.
The distinction matters because teachers unions regularly demand deference in education policy. They present themselves as the authentic voice of the classroom and accuse critics of politicizing schools. Then back-to-school season arrives, families are buying pencils and backpacks, and the union uses the moment to pressure a retailer over federal immigration enforcement.
Target should make its own decisions. Customers should make theirs. A corporation’s refusal to issue the political statement demanded by an outside organization is not an assault on democracy; it may simply be a business choosing not to serve as another campaign platform.
There is also a basic question of representation. Millions of educators do not share one view of immigration, Donald Trump or ICE. When union leaders launch a national campaign in their name, dissenting teachers are effectively conscripted into an argument they may reject.
The AFT says the campaign supports working families and directs shoppers toward local and union-friendly businesses. That is its defense, and consumers can judge it. Yet its announcement is explicit that Target’s silence on immigration enforcement triggered the boycott.
Americans wondering why education debates feel permanently partisan should study this episode. The organizations with the greatest institutional power in public education are not reluctant political participants. They are sophisticated advocacy operations capable of turning even the annual school-supply run into a pressure campaign.
The next time union leaders insist that politics has been dragged into the classroom by somebody else, remember the Target boycott. They packed the politics in the backpack themselves.
Marcus Bennett is a conservative commentator focused on crime, education, economic opportunity, urban policy, and American culture. Raised in a working-class community outside Atlanta, Bennett developed his politics around the belief that public policy should be judged by results rather than intentions. His columns frequently examine failing institutions, public safety, family stability, educational reform, and the political assumptions surrounding Black Americans. Bennett brings a skeptical, data-driven approach to political arguments and has little patience for ideological explanations that fail to match conditions on the ground.
Discussion
Loading discussion…